I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
Google searches for Discord alternatives have meanwhile spiked worldwide, with some social media users claiming to have cancelled their Discord subscriptions.，详情可参考91视频
Grammarly Offers a tone suggestion feature while Ginger doesn't offer a tone suggestion feature.
Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 266。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读